|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
16
|
194003
|
10/10/2012
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Purchase
|
|
94% of reviewers
|
$1,166.29
|
|
| Reader Review Rating Averages |
Readers' rating for
Construction Quality
|
Readers' rating for
Image Quality
|
Readers'
Overall Rating
|
|
9.63
|
9.56
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
claus
Registered: October 2010
Posts: 4
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by claus
|
|
Review Date: 10/10/2012
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Total Spent: $1,200.00| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
good AF , very sharp at f4 and up in the center, almost complete lack of CA.
|
|
Cons:
|
poor build quality for the price , soft until f2.8 , very soft at f1.4, never gets tack-sharp
|
|
it is a plain overpriced lens.
only pros I found are : its fast and accurate AF and its good flare performance.
I returned this one and I decided to use my Samyang 35f1.4 instead.
if it is not sharp below f2.8 , what is the point of having this super expensive prime or choosing it over the very very sharp almost flawless 70-200f4.0?
for me it is an useless prime, period.
I compared this lens to my Nikon 35f1.4G and Minolta 35f1.4 and both of these 2 outperformed my Canon 35f1.4.
I think this was the worst released Canon.
|
|
3systemuser
Registered: November 2010
Posts: 19
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by 3systemuser
|
|
Review Date: 8/31/2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,100.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
extreme central sharpness , quite well controlled CA, good contrast , super fast AF.
|
|
Cons:
|
Lo CA is a bit high, Fullframe edge is not very sharp wide open, not sealed.
|
|
it is an old lens and probably replaced very soon with sealed version of this lens.
so, it is kind of hard to justify it now , especially at current very high price.
but it is still a great lens and probably one of these best L lenses, epsically its cost and perfomance raito taken into consideration.
its central resolution is nothing short of outstanding from f2 and even at f1.4 it is quite sharp , a bit sharper than the very expensive new Zeisst*1.4/35ZE and Nikon AFS35f1.4G, though the Zeiss edges out in the edge and border perfomance.
its flare resistance is not as good as an SWC lens such as the newer EF24f1.4LMK2 or TSE24f3.5Lmk2 but it is still good at least as good as the Nikon 35f1.4G.
its AF is very fast , much faster than the Nikon AFS35f1.4G or Canon 50f1.2L.
it is very small , very well made but lacking sealings , this was actually the main reason why I sold it for the 24Lmk2 and waiting for a new 35L prime with SWC coating while shooting with the 24Lmk2 and T*1.4/35ZE.
over all though, it is not flawless but a great lens even in 2011 and it is amazing (it was out in 1998).
note: on a subframe body, it is almost flawless.
|
|
JPMuller
Registered: June 2010
Posts: 6
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by JPMuller
|
|
Review Date: 11/16/2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,350.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp! - even wide open. Beautiful Bokeh for a wide angle. I LOVE this lens!
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
This has definitely become my favorite, most used lens... I LOVE this lens. I am going to go out on a limb and say that if a perfect lens did exist, this lens would be a major contender. It does not let down in even the slightest way. Fast, Sharp - even wide open, light but great build, beautiful bokeh for a wide angle (obviously not as creamy as the 85 1.2), fast autofocus. There is something truly magical about this lens. It stays on my camera 90% of the time (had it for about 6 months now and do not see the honeymoon coming to an end any time soon). An absolute must have lens in my opinion.
Heavy?? I can hardly believe someone posted that it was heavy?? Try a 70-200 2.8 L IS or even the 85 1.2 L. This lens is not at all heavy for me... In fact, the only thing I might like to see different, is a metal body instead of the plastic one... It seems strong enough and I am sure it serves its purpose well. Time will tell since I will never part from this lens.
|
|
serg
Registered: March 2010
Posts: 4
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by serg
|
|
Review Date: 3/15/2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,400.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp,weight
|
|
Cons:
|
Weather Sealed - no
|
|
minimal CA & shading, fine focus, sharp
|
|
SETI
Registered: April 2007
Posts: 20
|
|
wrongnumber
Registered: March 2009
Posts: 2
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by wrongnumber
|
|
Review Date: 3/30/2009
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $800.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast, super sharp from 2 and up, fantastic bokeh
|
|
Cons:
|
heavy, obvious CA in bright light at 1.4
|
|
I love this lens, fast and really sharp when stopped up a little, really awesome bokeh and paper thin DoF , definitely on the heavier side, but solidly put together, definitely on the heavier side, but a solid piece nonetheless. There is some CA in the 1.4 to about 2 range of f stops when shooting into bright lights, but it can be avoided by stopping down. I got a great deal on a used lens so I can't really complain super happy with this lens, it practically lives on my camera body (XSI). I can't wait to see it on a full frame body.
|
|
waro52
Registered: December 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by waro52
|
|
Review Date: 12/31/2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,100.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
L quality all around
|
|
Cons:
|
price, size
|
|
Another winner from Canon. It makes a great normal lens for a 1.6x camera. Sharp and contrasty wide open. I love the low light capabilities of this lens. Almost makes flash unnecessary, almost. Very quick focus and superb construction. Duh, it's an L series. The vignetting others talk about is an extremely minor concern for my type of photography (indoor sports) and has not made any shot a tosser. It is big and heavy for a 35, but it balances nicely on a 40D, and it is an f/1.4 so weight is a small price to pay for the pictures its speed allows you to take. All in all, this lens will not disappoint you if you have money to burn.
|
|
nico77
Registered: October 2008
Posts: 1
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by nico77
|
|
Review Date: 10/1/2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,150.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
THE light. THE color.
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
bought during a trip in Hongkong, instead of the 28/1.8 (I wanted a 28 because I used a 28 all the time on my film cameras) and the 35/2, after having read the messages on this website. I get used to the 35mm framing. Mostly because this lens brings trully the light I was waiting for. Colors are slightly different when closing the diaf. But I didn't meant it was bad! I prefer this lens at 1.4.
This is a typical example of what you get with a 5D:
http://www.pbase.com/nicolasdechamps/image/103831671
After having tryed this lens I don't use anymore the 24-105L. In my current trip to Singapore and also in India, I only took this lens + 5D + a pair of leica's M6.
When reading about this lens I was concerned about the vignetting on a full frame. actually there is another example at 1.4 with the 5D: http://www.pbase.com/nicolasdechamps/image/99614485
As you can see you can notice it, but for me it is not at all a problem. Furthermore we usually like to add some vignetting in photoshop, right?
I personnally just find it sad that people stick with zooms as the 24-70L and forget about this prime.
This 1.4 aperture makes the difference, you can really work at night and also make nice portraits.
THis one is a night one, it is not that good but makes my point:
http://www.pbase.com/nicolasdechamps/image/102563633
save, buy and enjoy!
|
|
marshaa
Registered: June 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by marshaa
|
|
Review Date: 6/7/2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,000.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, light, gorgeous colors and clarity -
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
No negatives with this lens - great on a 40D as it approximates the "normal" 50 lens; used most of the time on my 5D. Images can be used straight out of the camera - deep, clear colors, wonderful contrast, my favorite lens.
|
|
lextalionis
Registered: October 2007
Posts: 82
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by lextalionis
|
|
Review Date: 2/22/2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,140.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Perfect "all light" well-balanced in size, very sharp and high IQ lens!
|
|
Cons:
|
A little pricy, but you get what you pay for.
|
|
I would be happy with this lens epoxied to my spare Canon 5D body!
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 L USM Lens Photo Samples
-Lex
|
|
Lee Jay
Registered: January 2007
Posts: 16
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by Lee Jay
|
|
Review Date: 1/7/2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,140.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Everything
|
|
Cons:
|
Nothing
|
|
This lens deserves its reputation. Fast focusing, fast optics, outstanding optically. Just a wonderful lens in every way.
|
|
gadgetguy
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 62
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by gadgetguy
|
|
Review Date: 1/5/2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
SUPERB image quality and construction
|
|
Cons:
|
none (if it fits your budget, that is!)
|
|
If you have a 1.6x crop DSLR, this is the "classic" lens for it because it approximates a "normal" focal length.
Image quality is what you would expect from a L-series prime - sharp, contrasty, and with great color. Bokeh is also excellent.
|
|
mebailey
Registered: December 2006
Posts: 21
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by mebailey
|
|
Review Date: 12/14/2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,148.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Super sharp even at f1.4, fast focus, great for existing light photography, light but well built.
|
|
Cons:
|
None Ive found
|
|
I really enjoy using this lens. I use for group shots on my 5D or as a walk-around on my XT. It delivers a high number of keeper every time out. I have used it very effectively outside at night for campfire shots. It is a solid investment for crop or full frame cameras.
|
|
killersnowman
Registered: October 2005
Posts: 10
|
|
AHAB
Registered: October 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by AHAB
|
|
Review Date: 11/27/2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Crisp, sharp images
|
|
Cons:
|
none, expensive, but pays for itself with great images!
|
|
I love this lens!
Great for low light wedding work, makes me think of ditching my 24-70 2.8.
The 35 lens has much more sharpness and detail.
I often use it for wedding and portrait shots... especially in the dark reception halls.
Beautiful colors, sharp, one of Canons finest lenses.
My other favorites:
85 1.2
135
200 1.8
If you must rent one, before you buy.
I'll never sell this lens!
AHAB
|
|
louisjaffe
Registered: April 2006
Posts: 4
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM review by louisjaffe
|
|
Review Date: 7/1/2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $1,100.00| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Optically excellent
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy and bulky
|
|
Expensive, heavy and bulky. But this lens has two great strengths. 1) Wide open, it's great for available light coverage. 2) At critical aperture, like f11, it's wonderfully sharp. On a Canon EOS 5d, this is the first lens I've seen that can really take advantage of every pixel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
