Interactive Lens Reviews and Opinion.
Digital Camera Reviews

Reviews Views Date of last review
5 49094 12/16/2008
Recommended By Average Purchase
100% of reviewers $342.25
Reader Review Rating Averages
Readers' rating for
Construction Quality
Readers' rating for
Image Quality
Overall Rating

Keywords: Sigma Canon Nikon Minolta Pentax Wide Zoom 35mm DG


Registered: June 2008
Posts: 6
Sigma 20-40mm f/2.8 EX DG Aspherical review by RRJackson
Review Date: 12/16/2008 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $279.00| Rating: 10 

Pros: Excellent optics, very useful range of focal lengths.
Cons: Screw-drive. Large 82mm filter threading.

This lens is something of an anomaly. Nobody else that I'm aware of makes a lens that covers this particular range. The closest thing I can think of is the Olympus 11-22mm (which with their 2x crop becomes a 22-44mm). This range of focal lengths is extremely useful to me. Most wide zooms go wider than this, but they don't go all the way to 40mm on the tele end. I'm not a huge fan of superwide zooms, but I love shooting "normal" at around 40mm. Being able to go wide when things get tight is lovely. By keeping the ratio down to 2:1 Sigma didn't have to make any real optical compromises. All in all this is a perfect "walking around" lens, IMO.

The build quality is excellent, the optics are wonderful and the overall size of the lens is just about perfect. I'd whine about the big filter threading (82mm), but I already had a UV and polarizer in 82mm threading, so it was a non-issue for me.

Sigma has discontinued this lens and it's a pity. I'd love to hear that they're reintroducing it with one of their HSM motors. I think this got lost because it wasn't a range that was ideally suited to crop-sensor cameras, but now that there are a few affordable options out there in full-frame cameras maybe it's time for Sigma to bring it back. Nothing wrong with the original, though. I'm certainly happy with mine.

Registered: May 2007
Posts: 24
Sigma 20-40mm f/2.8 EX DG Aspherical review by rainerknappe
Review Date: 5/18/2007 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $410.00| Rating: 9 

Pros: good optics - beautiful lens
Cons: CA´s and a bit heavy

I like this lens, its a very good alternative to my brilliant Tamron 17-50 2.8 (which I use with the Canon 20 DA). The price was really nice specially offering a beautiful design and construccion. I use this lens at my Pentax K 10 and its a really perfect combination - sharp from f 4.5, only little distortion and a bit more cornershading at 20mm and specially beautiful colours - highly recommended!

Registered: December 2006
Posts: 1
Sigma 20-40mm f/2.8 EX DG Aspherical review by ray_lam5
Review Date: 12/27/2006 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $500.00| Rating: 9 

Pros: Sharp at all focal lengths, little distortion at 20mm , excellent build quality
Cons: Soft wide open, quite big

Having owned this lens for a year now and having read all the reviews posted on other sites I feel this lens has been overlooked somewhat due to it not being designed for an aps-c sized sensor.

The lens is solidly built with a quality feel to it. I find the camera performs best between F5- F8 but is usable wide open in some instances. Its focusing is not the fastest in the world due to having no HSM and can be discrbed as a little tinny. It however is accurate in good lighting and performs well enough.
The sigma is somewhat of an enigma lens to me, it has so much going for it but i tend not to rely on its fast aperture. It performs best when used for landscapes, architecture and outdoor activities. For low light indoor work i usually rely on primes much more.

This is my jack of all trades lens and finds itself my most used outdoor lens. I would rather have use of the fast aperture in emergency situations then the extra 3 mm of the equivilent canon 17-40F4L. It is a sharper lens at f4 and displays no vignetting or distortion at 20 mm on my APS-H (1D) camera.

Registered: August 2006
Posts: 4
Sigma 20-40mm f/2.8 EX DG Aspherical review by Josstover
Review Date: 8/16/2006 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $180.00| Rating: 8 

Pros: Build, Sharp, minor distortion
Cons: Big and bulky, CA

I bought this lens after selling my nikkor 18-70 kitlens and I did not regret it. It produces clear and sharp images, vivid colors. Little barrel distortion at 20 mm which can be corrected in PS easily. The only problem is chromatic aberration, especially in the edges of the photo. Can be corrected also, but takes some time

Registered: November 2005
Posts: 3
Sigma 20-40mm f/2.8 EX DG Aspherical review by nspur
Review Date: 11/5/2005 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 9 

Pros: Optically very good with excellent build quality
Cons: Some barrel distortion at 20 mm. Not HSM

Sigma has produced an excellent 2x wide angle zoom lens with the 20-40 f2.8 EX DG.

While the range may not suit users of DX (APS-C format) cameras, it is very useful for full-frame film or digital. By not going ultra-wide, Sigma has avoided the corner softness that often affects such lenses. Throughout the range, sharpness is excellent, contrast is good and colour is good albeit slightly warm. This is also a lens that is not prone to vignetting; there is only very slight vignetting wide open at the wide end and no vignetting at the long end.

A disadvantage is that at 20 mm there is some barrel distortion but it is not excessively significant. In Photoshop CS2 is is necessary to correct the distortion by 1% to 2%.

Auto-focus is accurate. This lens does not have a High Speed Motor and consequently there is no full-time-manual focusing when in auto-focus mode. To implement manual focusing youhave to pull the focus ring towards you and also set the AF/MF switch to MF. Despite the lack of HSM, focusing is fast.

I would highly recommend this lens to anyone looking for a zoom lens in this range.


This document copyright © 2009-2015,, all rights reserved.