|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
4
|
21724
|
12/1/2008
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Purchase
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
$274.50
|
|
| Reader Review Rating Averages |
Readers' rating for Construction Quality
|
Readers' rating for Image Quality
|
Readers' Overall Rating
|
|
9.75
|
7.00
|
7.75
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
Badmono
Registered: August 2008 Posts: 15
|
|
Canon 2X Extender EF II review by Badmono
|
|
Review Date: 12/1/2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Makes my 400 F2.8 into a 800mm lens
|
|
Cons:
|
I tried 3 different examples before finding one that worked well with my lens
|
|
Works well with 400 F2.8 IS though I had to try out 3 different examples of the convertor to get one to work well with my lens.
Well worth the effort though since I now have a 800mm f5.6 IS lens which gives great results.
and whem stacked with a 1.4X convertor the results at 1120mm F8, ain't shabby either:-))
>
Thoughroughly recommended.
>
Forget using this 2x convertor with an 'L' zoom though the results are abysmal, this convertor really demands a top lens for it to work properly - NO zoom can meet this requirement.
|
|
hitendra
Registered: February 2007 Posts: 11
|
|
garys
Registered: December 2006 Posts: 12
|
|
Canon 2X Extender EF II review by garys
|
|
Review Date: 1/1/2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: $250.00| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
well built, nice way to get extra length when traveling
|
|
Cons:
|
image degradation
|
|
Obvious impact on image quality on multi-element lenses like the 70-200 2.8 is, but probably not as big an issue with the super teles. Still it does give you much more reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it!
|
|
ddesimoni
Registered: November 2006 Posts: 12
|
|
Canon 2X Extender EF II review by ddesimoni
|
|
Review Date: 11/18/2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
better then enlarging in PS
|
|
Cons:
|
image distortion
|
|
bought and sold this one within a few months. Didn't care for the quality, I compared shoots to enlarging in Photoshop and it does minimally better but not by much
|
|
|
|
|
|