Interactive Lens Reviews and Opinion.
Digital Camera Reviews

Reviews Views Date of last review
8 118247 3/31/2012
Recommended By Average Purchase
50% of reviewers $114.60
Reader Review Rating Averages
Readers' rating for
Construction Quality
Readers' rating for
Image Quality
Overall Rating

Keywords: Canon EF Wide Prime 35mm Tested


Registered: March 2012
Posts: 3
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by lucasbutchart
Review Date: 3/31/2012 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $50.00| Rating: 9 

Pros: small, lightweight, sharp, affordable
Cons: could have a tougher build

Just wanted to offset the bad reviews with a good one. This lens produces sharp images on my 5D and T2i.
Even at f2.8 the images look crisp and the colors are good. Of course with these newer DSLRs color can be tweaked in-camera so it's not a big issue. But I would say this lens' color is neutral, like the Canon ef 50mm f1.8.
I tested this lens against my ef 50mm f1.8 and found the 50mm f1.8 to be sharper wide open, but still the 28mm was acceptable.
I can't compare this one against the ef 28mm f1.8 USM but imagine the USM version is better.
I found this little gem for 30 euros and in perfect condition. It is a great lens value compared to $500 for the USM. This one is also smaller, lighter and has a more standard 52mm front thread size.
Don't hesitate if you run across one. Many may be 15-20 years old so sample variation from heavy use may be a factor in so many bad reviews of this lens.
Test it first if you can.
Here's a review:

Registered: July 2009
Posts: 6
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by Ashley_Pomeroy
Review Date: 5/5/2010 Would you recommend the product? No | Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 6 

Pros: Small, very cheap, sharp and good walkabout range on APS-C
Cons: Ancient design, not great on full-frame, redundant

There's an odd thing; I have a Canon 24mm f/2.8, which has a terrible blur plot here at SLRGear but performs well on my full-frame Canon 5D MkII when stopped down to f/8. It is sharp in the extreme corners at that aperture and beyond. I also have a 28mm f/2.8, which is the other way around, in the sense that SLRGear's profile is glowing but my copy, at least, is very unimpressive.

Having said that, my lens was made in August 1987, so it's almost as old as the EOS system itself and might have been knocked about. The optical design apparently dates from the FD era. The lens is still in production, unchanged since it was introduced, although it is overshadowed (and should really have been dropped in favour of) the 28mm f/1.8. For a while it was, I assume, a popular "second lens" for people who bought a Canon Rebel SLR and a 35-80mm kit zoom combination. Subsequently it has assumed a role as a decent "normal" lens on APS-C digital cameras, although Canon's modern 18-55mm IS is nowadays a much better choice.

On a full-frame camera, my copy of the lens is sharp in the middle at all apertures, with a bit of glow at f/2.8, but it gets very sharp when stopped down. However the corners are no better than my old 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom lens, and are objectively not great, even when stopped right down. The extreme edges are downright mushy at wider apertures than f/5.6. The 24mm f/2.8 is much better in this respect. I have no complaints with regards to colour and contrast.

On a physical level it has a noisy focus mechanism and a titchy manual focus ring. It's built to a higher standard than the 50mm f/1.8 but not by much. It doesn't seem particularly robust but then again my copy is twenty-three years old and still works. The 24mm f/2.8 doesn't rotate or extend during operation, whereas the 28mm f/2.8 has a filter thread section that moves in and out when focusing. As with the 50mm f/1.8 MkII I am wary of screwing anything too tightly into the thread.

It appears to be the second-cheapest Canon prime lens on the used market, after the 50mm f/1.8, because nobody really wants it. The 50mm f/1.8 is one of those lenses that people buy and keep because it fills a niche and it has emotional appeal. The 28mm feels anonymous and a bit pointless. There are oodles of cheap old manual focus 28mm lenses out there, some of which are excellent performers - the Olympus OM 28mm f/2, f/2.8 and f/3.5, for example, and also the Contax/Zeiss 28mm f/2.8 Distagon. The Zeiss will set you back a bit, but you could buy a pair Olympus 28mm f/3.5's for the price of a used Canon 28mm f/2.8 and pay for the postage too.

And that is that. Even in the 1990s it had been made redundant by a legion of 24, 28-Something zoom lenses. On a full-frame camera the corner sharpness is insufficient for my needs, and on a crop-sensor camera it offers very little over a decent zoom lens.

Registered: June 2008
Posts: 5
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by pepstein
Review Date: 6/25/2008 Would you recommend the product? No | Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 3 

Pros: Small and light
Cons: Not sharp, chromatic aberration

Tested on a full frame body, my copy of this lens seems even worse than average, as it is sharpest at f/16 to f/22, where diffraction normally makes sharpness decrease from its peak. Chromatic aberration and blurry corners make me wonder when I'd ever choose to use the lens. I'd love to have something small and light for hiking photography, but this lens isn't good enough. The noisy auto-focus is annoying, but I'd gladly put up with it if image quality was better.

Registered: December 2006
Posts: 12
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by _Mike_D
Review Date: 1/1/2007 Would you recommend the product? No | Total Spent: $150.00| Rating: 5 

Pros: Small, seemingly well built
Cons: broke after 5 months, very soft wide open.

This is the only canon lens that I regret buying. I bought it thinking it would be a good walk around ~50mm lens, but after a few shots I was surprised how soft and bland looking my shots were. After a while, I found that stopping down to f5.0 or so corrected many of the problems. But soon after that the apature ring got stuck in it smallest position.

I probably just got a bad copy, but I still would not recommend this lens to anyone.

Registered: November 2006
Posts: 1
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by jon
Review Date: 11/15/2006 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $70.00| Rating: 8 

Pros: cheap, great image quality
Cons: noisy when focusing

Got this lens second hand for $70 bucks, and it turned out to be my most loved lens. i still shoot film and i have this on my cam most of the time. i shoot mostly landscape and although 28mm is sometimes not wide enough, i get by pretty well with this baby.

Focusing speed is slow and noisy, but not a big problem. good thing the front element doesn't move when you focus, so using a polarizer won't be a problem. Image quality is way better than any consumer zooms (even with mid range priced zooms).

One thing i like, it has almost exactly the same built as the older 50 1.8 mark I, which has a metal mount and a distance scale.

For digital shooters(with cropped sensors) who needs a normal lens, nothing can beat this lens for the IQ at this price.

Registered: November 2006
Posts: 9
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by drwho9437
Review Date: 11/15/2006 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $160.00| Rating: 8 

Pros: Light, sharp, flare resistant/contrast
Cons: A bit slow, noisy

I use to have one of these. Its a fine lens, but I felt my 35 f2.0 all but replaced it. This lens has very few elements in it. I say this because I noted when I used it that it was a good performer looking into the sun, pretty flare resistant and maintained contrast pretty well compared to lenses I had used up to that day.

I would only complain really that it is 2.8. At this focal length that doesn't give you quite enough DOF control I don't think. You can't really isolate a subject as well as with the 35 f2 or the sigma 30 1.4 etc.

Its still a fine lens though and has its uses, find the DOF chart and see if it suits you. It like all its twins in this series has a noisy focusing motor but its quick and gets the job done.
David Hay

Registered: November 2006
Posts: 8
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by David Hay
Review Date: 11/7/2006 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Total Spent: $143.00| Rating: 9 

Pros: Small, light, cheap, sharp.
Cons: Noisy AF.

I bought this lens second-hand. It is well corrected with little barrel distortion. It produces high contrast images sharp from edge to edge. It came with a lens hood but I rarely need to use it as flare is not a problem. Manual focus is light but rough and AF is noisy although quite quick.

Registered: November 2006
Posts: 2
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 review by joe_e_e
Review Date: 11/5/2006 Would you recommend the product? No | Total Spent: None indicated| Rating: 5 

Pros: price, size
Cons: image quality

Perhaps I had a bad exemplar of this lens, but its image quality on my 20D sucked. At f/2.8 it was quite unsharp even at the centre. At f/4 image quality improved dramatically, but was still below my 17-40/4@28/4. At f/8 the two were just about equal.

I only heard good word about this lens, and the test here at SLR-gear is quite positive. But as I was looking for a high-speed "normal" prime for my 20D, this lens certainly failed to impress me. I should probably test another exemplar at some point.


This document copyright © 2009-2015,, all rights reserved.